Every gram counts - and so does every kelvin
In aerospace, cooling capacity and mass compete directly. We design heat sinks that deliver both: minimum mass with maximum heat dissipation, built for vibration, thermal cycling and vacuum.



More than the avionics gets hot on board.
Besides power electronics we cool structural parts, drives and system components. That is where cooling decides the permissible continuous load, and how much mass you have to carry for it.
-
Avionics & control units
Compact cold plates for densely packed electronics racks.
-
Power electronics
Inverters and converters in electric drivetrains.
-
Battery systems
Even cell temperature control across large areas.
-
E-motors & stators
Removing waste heat directly at the winding.
-
Structural parts
Cooling channels integrated into load-bearing parts, which saves mass.
-
Radar & sensors
Temperature stability for reliable measurement accuracy.
-
Onboard power & distribution
Busbars and switchgear in the on-board power system.
Mass · Reliability · Qualifiability
In aerospace, none of these three axes can be traded for another. A lightweight cooler that fails vibration testing is worthless. We therefore design against all three from the start.
-
Mass
Cooling capacity per kilogram is the figure that matters. We design against the mass budget, not against a catalogue.
-
Reliability
We design for vibration, shock, thermal cycling and long-term stability across the required service life.
-
Qualifiability
Material certificates, dimensional and leak test records: we plan the documentation into the process before series start.
What we design for aerospace
- Leichtbau-Cold-Plates : cooling capacity at minimum mass.
- Structurally integrated cooling : channel and structure in a single part.
- Battery and drive cooling : for electric and hybrid drivetrains.
- Vacuum-compatible parts : low outgassing, helium leak tested.
- Sonderkonstruktionen : for tight and irregular installation spaces.
We name references in conversation, because many projects run under NDA.

Three designs that make the difference in aerospace.

Multipress
Press-fitted tubes in the cold plate: process-reliable, robust and easy to match to lightweight materials. Available in aluminium, copper, copper-nickel or stainless steel.

Structureflow
Cooling channels integrated directly into the load-bearing structure. One part instead of an assembly saves mass, interfaces and joints.

Turbulators
Up to 40 % more cooling capacity at an acceptable pressure drop. We place them selectively where the load sits.
Everything from one source, from development to series production.
COOLTEC handles your thermal management completely: one contact, one process, from the first idea to series delivery. You join wherever you stand. Development, simulation and design are optional.
- Optional
Development & simulation
We develop, simulate and design your cooling solution. We test it virtually before we produce anything physically.
-
Manufacturability & cost
You already know what you need? We assess manufacturability and optimise your design for series production.
-
Samples & prototypes
Samples in around 6-8 weeks as standard, or 2-4 weeks by express, depending on product and complexity.
-
Series production
From one supplier: highly automated high-tech manufacturing in Germany, low-cost series from Asia.
-
Supply & lifecycle
Framework contracts, stockholding, last-time buy: we secure your supply across the entire product lifecycle.



Aerospace Thermal Guide: cooling within a mass budget
Design knowledge rather than a product catalogue: how to reconcile cooling capacity, mass and qualifiability, and where projects typically fail.

Sebastian Krüger
Bring your thermal challenge: heat load, installation space, medium, ambient conditions. In the first call Sebastian works out the right approaches with you and puts together the team we need for it, from application engineering, production engineering and thermal engineering. You will not be put on hold.
The questions aerospace engineers actually ask us.
Is COOLTEC certified to EN 9100?
No. COOLTEC is certified to DIN EN ISO 9001:2015 (TÜV Thüringen), not to EN 9100. For a flight-approved series part that is a knock-out criterion, which is why we say it first rather than in the small print. Where we regularly work in aerospace is the phase before that: technology studies, pre-development, functional samples and test rig assemblies. These are parts that do not fly but that decide the design. We supply material certificates, dimensional reports and leak test records; we do not supply part certification or qualification to an aviation standard. If your project later goes into series production, the clean sequence is design and samples with us, then series manufacturing at an EN 9100 facility, with handover of the design where appropriate.
Read more –>Can fuel be used as a coolant?
Fuel as a coolant, the so-called fuel cooler, is technically possible and is used in aviation because the fuel is on board anyway and has a high heat capacity. The challenges are not thermal but safety- and material-related: the circuit carries a flammable medium, so leak tightness and double barriers between fuel and electronics take on a different quality than with water-glycol. On the material side, the media-wetted surface has to be compatible with kerosene and its additives; aluminium is generally suitable, elastomers are critical and have to be selected as fuel-resistant. We assess feasibility, material choice and the sealing concept. One limit: the safety assessment and approval of a fuel-carrying cooling circuit in an aircraft lies entirely with you, and we are not the right partner for that.
Read more –>How light can a cooler be built without losing pressure resistance?
Lightweight design in liquid coolers means leaving material only where it conducts heat or takes pressure. In practice we use pockets in non-load-bearing areas and thin walls between the channels, and we leave out solid edge regions. The trade-off is hard and cannot be designed away: every reduction in wall thickness lowers the permissible operating pressure and increases deflection. That is why we need the priority from you and the actual operating pressure, not the test pressure of a standard that may not even apply. Target weights of a few kilograms at several hundred watts are achievable if the structure is designed consistently for it. Limit: maximising weight, pressure resistance and low thermal resistance all at once does not work. Of those three you get two.
Read more –>Can bent or curved coolers be manufactured?
Yes. Curved coolers for cylindrical or conical parts are a case of their own, for example for cooling engine or housing components where a flat plate does not make contact. We implement this with curved base bodies with press-fitted tubes or with segments that follow the contour. More important than the curvature itself is the contact: a curved cooler only helps if it makes contact across the whole surface, otherwise an air gap forms that degrades the cooling more than the curved shape improves it. That is why we work with a defined contour and a contact-pressure concept, not just with a radius. Limit: very small radii restrict tube diameter and therefore volume flow. With tight curvatures we check whether channels rather than tubes are the better solution.
Read more –>Where do the parts come from, and is the origin of goods documented?
Manufacturing and assembly take place in Germany; raw material and individual process steps may come from partners and supplying mills inside and outside Europe. On request we document the origin of goods for a part. That is a recurring requirement, both for customs purposes and for supplier qualifications in which origin is an assessment criterion. Important for your planning: proof of origin has to be agreed before ordering, because it depends on the supply chain of the specific order and cannot be reconstructed afterwards. If you have requirements for the origin of the raw material, European aluminium for example, state that in your enquiry, because it affects availability and price. Limit: we can only guarantee an unbroken chain of origin back to the melt if the supplying mill documents it.
Read more –>How do you design against a mass budget?
We frame the task as cooling capacity per unit mass rather than as absolute cooling capacity. In simulation we compare variants with different wall thickness, material and channel routing and show you where the curve flattens. That is the economical design point.
How do you account for vibration and thermal cycling?
Joints and interfaces are the critical points. We therefore prefer designs with few joints and dimension them for the required load cycles.
Which materials do you process?
Aluminium for lightweight design, copper for maximum conductivity, copper-nickel and stainless steel for resistance. In many aerospace projects we combine: conductive material at the heat source, light material in the structure.
Are your parts vacuum-compatible?
Yes. We select low-outgassing materials, avoid trapped volumes and match cleaning and joining processes to the vacuum requirement. We document leak tightness down to the range of helium testing.
In which sizes do you manufacture heat sinks and liquid cold plates?
We manufacture everything from a 30 mm microchannel cooler to a 3 m (30,000 mm) cold plate, including fully cooled large precision parts. Size alone does not decide what is possible; material, design and tolerance do. Give us your dimensions and we will tell you in which design we can produce them.
Do you also cool structural parts and drives?
Yes, and in aerospace that is often the bigger lever. We integrate cooling channels into load-bearing parts and cool stators, batteries and drive electronics. That saves mass compared with separate heat sinks.
Do you also build for electric drivetrains?
Yes: inverters, converters, battery modules and e-motors.
What documentation do you supply for qualification?
Material certificates, dimensional reports, pressure and leak test records to the agreed scope per lot or per part. For initial sample inspections we prepare the documentation to your specification.
Which quantities and lead times are possible?
Samples in around 6-8 weeks, or 2-4 weeks by express. Aerospace projects typically run in small to medium quantities with a high variety of variants, which is what our manufacturing is set up for.
Heat sinks in aerospace: what matters technically
Thermal management in aerospace is always an optimisation under constraints: mass, installation space, vibration, qualification. The following sections summarise our approach.
How we design a cooling solution
Every design starts from the same boundary conditions: heat load Pv, maximum permissible component temperature, ambient or inlet temperature and the available contact area. Only these determine which cooling strategy is feasible at all.
The four key parameters of a thermal system
Five steps to the right cooling solution
What influences the thermal resistance of an air-cooled heat sink
Materials: thermal conductivity and flow limits
The choice of material determines thermal performance and service life. If the flow velocity in the tube exceeds the maximum recommendation, the medium mechanically removes the protective passive layer, which leads to erosion and leakage.
| Material | Thermal conductivity at 20 °C | Max. flow velocity |
|---|---|---|
| Copper / copper alloys | 305–394 W/m·K | 2,0 m/s |
| Aluminium / Al alloys | 125–210 W/m·K | 1.8 m/s (structures 1–2 m/s) |
| Copper-nickel (CuNi) | - | 3,5 m/s |
| Stainless steel | low conductivity, very good corrosion resistance | 4,5 m/s |
| Graphite (parallel to the layer plane) | up to 2000 W/m·K, technically 140–160 W/m·K | - |
| Sintered ceramics (BN, SiC) | 100–200 W/m·K, electrically insulating | - |
The data we need for your design
The more complete the boundary conditions, the faster we get from a first estimate to a reliable CFD simulation. This checklist comes from the Cool How Report and is the basis of every design discussion.
Cooling capacity per kilogram
Absolute cooling capacity is rarely the decisive figure in aerospace. The relevant question is how much heat you can remove per kilogram of mass carried, and at which point additional mass barely adds performance.
We show that point in simulation: variants with different wall thickness, channel count and material in direct comparison. You make the decision on the basis of numbers, not rules of thumb.
Structurally integrated cooling
The biggest saving in mass comes when the cooler and the structural part become one part. Channels then run through load-bearing material; joints and fixings disappear.
That requires thermal and mechanical design to run together. We therefore design such parts in dialogue with your structures department, not after it.
Vibration, shock and load cycles
Joints are the weak point of any cooler under vibration. Every connection between tube, plate and port is a potential crack origin over the service life.
We therefore prefer designs with few joints and verify the remaining ones against the required load cycles. Which test standards apply is clarified at the start of the project.
Qualification without surprises
Qualification rarely fails on cooling capacity, often on missing documentation. Material certificates, dimensional reports and leak test records have to be planned into the process from the outset.
We agree the scope of documentation before series start and plan the test steps in, instead of reconstructing them afterwards.
Get the Aerospace Thermal Guide
Three details, one click, instant download. After that you decide whether we talk about your project.
A thermal problem under a mass budget?
Send us your load case: heat load, mass, installation space, ambient conditions. We will tell you whether and how we can solve it.